The Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct, and Public Petitions has firmly defended its recent dismissal of several public petitions, clarifying that all legislative decisions are anchored strictly on legal substance, judicial precedent, and verified evidence rather than public sentiment.
Speaking in Abuja following a public hearing on April 24, the Committee Chairman, Senator Neda Imasuen, emphasized that the National Assembly cannot act as an appellate court or overturn valid judicial rulings under the guise of legislative intervention. He noted that many dismissed petitions failed due to a lack of full disclosure and legal merit from petitioners.
“The committee’s actions were guided strictly by the law and available evidence,” Senator Imasuen stated, cautioning that petitioners often undermine their own cases by withholding information regarding prior court judgments.
To ensure public transparency, the Committee highlighted the facts behind two major dismissed cases:
Nigeria Customs Service Dispute: A petitioner accused the agency of wrongdoing regarding seized merchandise. However, Senate investigations revealed a clear breach of import regulations. A Federal High Court had already ruled in favor of the Customs Service, ordering a forfeiture of the undeclared items. Senator Imasuen reiterated that the Senate cannot constitutionally reopen cases settled by a competent court of law.
Fidelity Bank Misconduct Allegation: Allegations of financial misconduct against the financial institution were dismissed after documentary evidence proved that the funds in question were legitimately disbursed. Financial records and the petitioner’s own admission confirmed that the loan was credited and withdrawals were duly authorized.
While reinforcing its strict standards for evidence, the Committee announced it is intensifying a major ongoing investigation into a sensitive pension dispute involving retirees of the defunct Afribank and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
Expressing deep concern over allegations of missing pension funds and administrative lapses affecting vulnerable retirees, Senator Imasuen revealed that the Committee has issued a strict two-week ultimatum. All involved parties must submit additional documentation and evidence before a final legislative position is taken.
“We are still investigating this matter thoroughly. Where there is merit, justice will not be denied,” Imasuen assured.
The Senate Committee reaffirmed its accessibility to the general public but warned against attempts to politicize oversight mechanisms, maintaining that only transparent, evidence-backed petitions will be considered for redress.